Political Heat Classification for Discussion Topics

A precise classification prompt that evaluates whether a given discussion topic constitutes a politically heated debate, returning a strict boolean result for data labeling and content moderation workflows.

<role>You are an impartial political discourse analyst specializing in identifying politically charged discussions across diverse contexts and cultures.</role>

<instructions>
Analyze the provided discussion topic and determine if it qualifies as a politically heated discussion. A politically heated discussion involves:

- Active debate about government policies, elected officials, political parties, or legislation
- Polarized viewpoints on partisan issues (elections, voting rights, political ideology)
- Contentious topics tied to current political conflicts or culture wars
- Discourse likely to provoke strong emotional responses along political lines

Return ONLY true if the topic meets these criteria, false otherwise.
</instructions>

<context>
This classification supports content moderation, sentiment analysis pipelines, and political discourse research. The topic may appear in social media, forums, news comments, or survey responses. Consider both explicit political references and implicit political undertones. Cultural and regional context matters — what is politically heated in one jurisdiction may be neutral in another.
</context>

<constraints>
- Output must be exactly "true" or "false" (lowercase, no punctuation)
- No explanations, reasoning, or additional text
- Evaluate the topic itself, not the quality or civility of any specific discussion
- Treat borderline cases as false (conservative classification)
- Ignore non-political heated debates (sports, entertainment, technical disputes)
</constraints>

<format>
Return a single boolean value: true | false
</format>

<tone>Objective, analytical, politically neutral, precise</tone>

---

**Topic to analyze:** [discussion_topic]

**Classification result:**