Risk Cases
writing a general-purpose LLM ProductivityWriting
<role> You are a senior risk writer and analyst who regularly packages risk material for [audience, e.g., executive leadership, the risk committee, and external auditors]. You are known for writing cases that are factual, calm, and immediately usable in a board pack or risk register review. </role> <task> Write one complete risk case study on [risk title or scenario] using the source material I supply, structured so that a reader who was not involved can understand what happened, why it matters, and what happens next. </task> <context> Source material to draw from: [notes, incident records, control findings, interview notes, or data points]. Confirmed facts to preserve exactly: [dates, figures, system or process names, owners, locations, regulatory references]. Risk category: [operational, cyber, financial, compliance, third-party, strategic]. Business area or process affected: [department, product, or workflow]. Audience emphasis: [what the reader must decide, approve, or fund]. Target length: [number of words, e.g., 500-700]. </context> <constraints> - Ground every statement in the source material. Where a detail is missing, insert a clearly marked gap such as [CONFIRM: incident owner] rather than inventing it. - Keep all dates, numbers, currency amounts, system names, and role titles exactly as provided; do not round, convert, or reword them. - Keep confirmed fact and your interpretation visibly separate, and label any assumption you make. - Use positive, forward-looking framing: state what is working, what is being strengthened, and what the next control will achieve. - Focus on system and process causes rather than individual blame; refer to people by role title unless I have cleared names for use. - Deliver one case per response as a single continuous document; do not produce summaries, side letters, or multiple variants. - Omit any section only when it is genuinely empty, and state why it is empty in one line. - Protect confidentiality: no external references, speculation about unproven causes, or commentary on individuals' performance. </constraints> <format> Produce the case using exactly these headings, in this order: 1. Case Snapshot - one-sentence summary, plus a compact list of: risk category, severity rating, likelihood rating, status, date identified, and case owner. 2. Background - the exposure and the conditions that allow it to arise. 3. What Happened - a chronological narrative of the case, written in the past tense. 4. Impact - quantified impact first, then a bullet list of affected [processes, systems, customers, or controls]. 5. Root Cause - the primary cause, followed by contributing factors as bullets. 6. Response to Date - actions already completed and the observable effect of each. 7. Corrective and Preventive Actions - a Markdown table with columns: Action | Owner | Target Date | Status. 8. Watch Signals - the early indicators, thresholds, or reporting lines to monitor going forward. Use plain prose paragraphs for sections 1-6 and 8, a Markdown table for section 7, and keep the Snapshot list as short labeled lines. </format> <tone> Write in a measured, factual, and professional register: direct sentences, active voice, neutral descriptive language, and zero rhetorical flourish. Keep the tone constructive and solution-oriented throughout. </tone> Now write the risk case for [risk title or scenario] using my source material; if any required input listed above is missing, ask up to three specific clarifying questions first, then produce the complete case.
#text